« Home | Where is Edward R. Murrow when you need him? » | Entry #1. »
Posted by Devon on Friday, September 08, 2006 at 9/08/2006 08:47:00 AM | Permalink
i am well aware of the discovery institute's claims on knowledge of evolution. HERE is a little info on them.the problem with creationists arguments is the logical falicy they always end up with. there are gaps of knowledge in evolution, to be sure. creationists fill those gaps with "god did it." this is known as the "god of the gaps" argument (see #7 on the link.) This is simply not science.anyone is perfectly welcome to believe whatever they want about the origin of our species. you are even welcome to send your kids to schools to teach them whatever you would like. if you want to believe "god did it" fine. if you think we were planted here by aliens, go for it. that doesn't make it true.the fact remains, evolution is a prooven, solid theory (see it's definition pertaining to science.) the problem with intelligent design, is that it is mearly creationism with a more scientific name. creation is a religious concept, not a scientific one and therefore should not taught as science is our public (taxpayer funded) schools.
Posted by Devon | 11:46 AM
I can't see evolution and "intelligent design" coexisting at all. Where are the parallels? Don't get me wrong I very much agree with the evolution side of the argument but it does not jibe with the bible. Evangelicals will not allow it will they? Besides there is no middle ground at all like you said.I am skeptical with some of Leakey's conclusions also but the foundation of what he is trying to say is pretty good stuff.I would not call all of evolution 100% irrefutable though. That is talking in absolutes which is what the creationism proponents talk in.I guess I have more questions than answers though.Like why are some species relatively unchanged over millions of years?
Posted by Shane | 1:07 AM
Intelligent Design collapses under the weight of a fucking marshmallow.
Posted by kara | 11:39 AM
i am well aware of the discovery institute's claims on knowledge of evolution.
HERE is a little info on them.
the problem with creationists arguments is the logical falicy they always end up with.
there are gaps of knowledge in evolution, to be sure. creationists fill those gaps with "god did it." this is known as the "god of the gaps" argument (see #7 on the link.) This is simply not science.
anyone is perfectly welcome to believe whatever they want about the origin of our species. you are even welcome to send your kids to schools to teach them whatever you would like. if you want to believe "god did it" fine. if you think we were planted here by aliens, go for it. that doesn't make it true.
the fact remains, evolution is a prooven, solid theory (see it's definition pertaining to science.) the problem with intelligent design, is that it is mearly creationism with a more scientific name. creation is a religious concept, not a scientific one and therefore should not taught as science is our public (taxpayer funded) schools.
Posted by Devon | 11:46 AM
I can't see evolution and "intelligent design" coexisting at all. Where are the parallels? Don't get me wrong I very much agree with the evolution side of the argument but it does not jibe with the bible. Evangelicals will not allow it will they? Besides there is no middle ground at all like you said.
I am skeptical with some of Leakey's conclusions also but the foundation of what he is trying to say is pretty good stuff.
I would not call all of evolution 100% irrefutable though. That is talking in absolutes which is what the creationism proponents talk in.
I guess I have more questions than answers though.
Like why are some species relatively unchanged over millions of years?
Posted by Shane | 1:07 AM
Intelligent Design collapses under the weight of a fucking marshmallow.
Posted by kara | 11:39 AM